Thursday, 20 February 2014
Mutual fund
Mutual fund
Ø Mutual fund is a financial
intermediary that pools the savings of investors for collective investment in a
diversified portfolio of securities.
Ø The SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations,
1996 defines mutual fund as a “ a fund established in the form of a trust to
raise money through the sale of units to the public.
Ø MF serves as a link between the
investor and the securities market by mobilizing savings from the investors and
investing them in the securities market to generate returns.
Ø The basic objective of mutual fund
is to provide continuous liquidity and higher yields
Benefits of Mutual Fund
Ø Professional Management
Ø Portfolio Diversification
Ø Reduction in transaction cost
Ø Liquidity
Ø Convenience
Ø Flexibility
Ø Tax benefits
Ø Transparency
Ø Equity Research
Types of Mutual Fund Schemes
• Open-ended Fund
/ Scheme
Ø
An open-ended fund or scheme is one that is available for
subscription and repurchase on a continuous basis.
Ø
These schemes do not have a fixed maturity period. The
number of units outstanding goes up or down every time, the fund issues new
units or repurchasing existing units. This means, the unit capital of an
open-ended mutul fund is not fixed but its variable.
Ø
Not listed in the stock exchange
Ø
Investors can conveniently buy and sell units at Net
Asset Value (NAV) related prices which are declared on a daily basis. The key
feature of open-end schemes is liquidity.
• Close-ended
Fund / Scheme
Ø
A close-ended fund or scheme has a stipulated maturity
period.
Ø
Realization is possible at the end of maturity
Ø
In order to provide an exit route to the investors, some
close-ended funds give an option of selling back the units to the mutual fund
through periodic repurchase at NAV related prices.
Ø
SEBI Regulations
stipulate that at least one of the two exit routes is provided to the investor
i.e. either repurchase facility or through listing on stock exchanges. These
mutual funds schemes disclose NAV generally on weekly basis.
Ø
And unit capital of a close-ended fund is fixed, because
it makes a one time sale of a fixed number of units.
• Growth / Equity
Oriented Schemes
Ø
The aim of growth funds is to provide capital
appreciation over the medium to long- term. Such schemes normally invest a
major part of their corpus in equities.
Ø
Such funds have comparatively high risks.
Ø
These schemes provide different options to the investors
like dividend option, capital appreciation, etc. and the investors may choose
an option depending on their preferences.
Ø
The mutual funds also allow the investors to change the
options at a later date.
Ø
Growth schemes are good for investors having a long-term
outlook seeking appreciation over a period of time.
• Income/ Debt
Oriented Schemes
Ø
The aim of income funds is to provide regular and steady
income to investors.
Ø
Such schemes generally invest in fixed income securities
such as bonds, corporate debentures, Government securities and money market
instruments.
Ø
Such funds are less risky compared to equity schemes.
These funds are not affected because of fluctuations in equity markets.
However, opportunities of capital appreciation are also limited in such funds.
Ø
The NAVs of such funds are affected because of change in
the domestic interest rates. However, long term investors may not bother about
these fluctuations.
Sunday, 16 February 2014
EXPLAIN THE CONCEPT OF EXCESS CAPACITY & WASTE IN MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION
v
EXPLAIN THE CONCEPT OF EXCESS CAPACITY & WASTE IN MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION
§ DEFINATION OF WASTE.
§ EXAMPLE OF WASTE.
§ ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT
PROFFSSORS.
§ CAUSES.
§ REASONS.
§ DIAGRAMS.
§ ANALYSIS.
DEFINATION OF WASTE
“Waste means whatever
extra quantity which is left over and unutilized by producer.”
EXAMPLE OF WASTE
Molasses left over after
sugarcane is used.
Food left over after marriage
function is over.
ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT
PROFESSORS
1)
PROFESSOR MEADE
“The term ‘waste’ refers
to waste of monopolistic & not prefect competition. Because in perfect
competition hardly any waste takes place”.
2)
PROFESSOR ROTHSCHILD
There are 7 kinds of waste in
Monopolistic market
I.
Expense
on competitive advertisement.
II.
Expense
on cross transport.
III.
Failure
in specialization.
IV.
Excess
capacity.
V.
Existence
of inefficient forms.
VI.
Higher
price & less output.
VII.
Unemployment.
CAUSES
1)
As demand curve is perfectly inelastic and
average cost is decreasing, there is less use of resources.
2)
Present
Firms who is get maximum short run profit, has to divide its profit with new
entrance of firms. Thus, in long run, each firm will have to make less
production, which leaders to excess capacity of production
EXM: T.V,
clothes, etc…
REASONS FOR EXCESS CAPICITY
1)
In the
perfect competition: under this competition, MC&AC are equal at equilibrium
in long run. So, AC is at minimum. Therefore, resources are used at optimum
manner.
2)
In
Monopolistic Competition: there is AC more than AC at equilibrium in long-run.
This means firm earns minimum Ac after equilibrium takes place. As a result,
excess capacity takes place.
ANALYSIS
Ø X-axis indicates output in units
Y-axis indicates revenue &
cost.
Ø In monopolistic competition, equilibrium takes
place between OM and at equilibrium point.
Ø MC cuts AR at B & cuts MR at E.
Ø If a vertical line in drawn at E, then at firm
earns MC equal to MR.
Ø Hear, AR is equal to price curve but AC is
higher than MC.
Ø Here, AC of firm is Minimum at B point. Because
at here AC interests MC& AC is minimum.
Ø In perfect competition, AR & MR are equal,
so no wastage is possible. But in monopolistic, firm get equilibrium at normal
Profit, but MN capacity is still remain unutilized.
Ø As factors production remains fully unutilized,
at equilibrium point, full employment or max output cannot be achieved. Here, capacities
of production remains excess & so products can be made at higher cost &
there prices are kept quite high. Thus, wastage is created.
Ø Prof. Hicks & Robertson believe that it is
not a social waste because different classes of peoples get variety of products
due to this. If there is excess capacity of production, in times of accidental rise
in demand, supply of production can be increased without increasing proportion
of fixed factors.
Ø Here; at point A, cost is higher and profit is
higher. But maximum utilization is not possible. So, it is not proper place for
production for firm to produce goods at minimum cost & to earn maximum
profit.
Ø And at point B, Profit is not maximum and AC is
at minimum, while resources are used at maximum. But if firm doesn’t get
profit, how can a firm continue business or bear loss? So, its not proper point
of production.
So, as per this, we can say:
“Excess
capacity & wastage is seen in monopolistic competition.
Thursday, 13 February 2014
Functions of World Bank
What are the Functions of World Bank?
World Bank performs the following functions:
(i) Granting reconstruction loans to war devastated countries.
(ii) Granting developmental loans to underdeveloped countries.
(iii) Providing loans to governments for agriculture, irrigation, power, transport, water supply, educations, health, etc
(iv) Providing loans to private concerns for specified projects.
(v) Promoting foreign investment by guaranteeing loans provided by other organisations.
(vi)Providing technical, economic and monetary advice to member countries for specific projects
(vii) Encouraging industrial development of underdeveloped countries by promoting economic reforms.
World Bank performs the following functions:
(i) Granting reconstruction loans to war devastated countries.
(ii) Granting developmental loans to underdeveloped countries.
(iii) Providing loans to governments for agriculture, irrigation, power, transport, water supply, educations, health, etc
(iv) Providing loans to private concerns for specified projects.
(v) Promoting foreign investment by guaranteeing loans provided by other organisations.
(vi)Providing technical, economic and monetary advice to member countries for specific projects
(vii) Encouraging industrial development of underdeveloped countries by promoting economic reforms.
Tuesday, 11 February 2014
Important of SEZ
How SEZ’s should be modelled to Benefit India:
Size Does Matter: I was reading an article and found out the
following fact, China’s SEZs are huge. Shenzhen, the most important SEZ, covers
32,000 hectares. In India, there are just two or three privately developed SEZ,
exceeding 1,000 hectares. Most of the others approved are less than 100
hectares. But it is heartening to realize that the government has decided
to up the ante and have made guidelines to have a minimum of 1000 hectares of
area for approving an SEZ. It hardly needs reiteration that only a large sized
zone can generate economic activity on some reasonable scale. In a small zone,
the requisite infrastructure and services cannot be provided nor can multiple
economic activities be promoted.
TAX Benefits: The incentive package in India is quite
liberal and may even be a shade better than that for Chinese SEZs. In fact, it
is more or less on a par with the package for the existing EPZs. Duty free
import of capital goods and raw materials, reimbursements of Central Sales Tax,
tax holiday for specified period, 100 per cent repatriation of profits for
subcontracting facilities are allowed. The Government has done well by
extending incentives for the infrastructure sector to zone developers and the
units as well. This can attract foreign direct investment for providing
internationally competitive infrastructure.
Labor Laws: We can learn from china where initially labor
laws where relaxed so that the companies could adopt Hire and Fire policy, once
the Private and foreign players gained confidence in the Chinese workers’
productivity, this was replaced by the Contract system. India should take cue
from this and understand that the import-export business is highly dependent on
uncertain international market conditions, rejection of consignments etc. hence
a flexible labor policy is the need of hour in the SEZ’s.
Domestic Tariff Areas: We got to understand that the reason for
the Foreign investors to invest in Industrial, Manufacturing sector in India is
not only to cut down on their costs because of cheaper and competitive products
but they also see the vast Indian consumer markets, which has seen great income
rise and standard of living. So apart from exports itself, the domestic market
itself provides immense opportunity for sale of products. The companies in SEZ
being levied a full import duty on sale in domestic areas does not seem a
bright idea. In this case SEZ’s will only promote export driven industries
which are highly dependent on import of raw materials. To further make use of
full potential of SEZ’s Industries which are capable of indigenous generation
of raw materials should be provided with tax holidays in terms of benefits to
facilitate competitive pricing in the domestic tariff areas.
Thinking about the Future and Possible
Fallacies: As evidence over the
years has shown, this single-minded pursuit of growth has lowered the
efficiency and effectiveness of economic policies, besides incurring huge
resource and environmental costs. The Chinese experience offers a valuable
lesson for India. Neither the international nor the Indian experience with SEZs
has been particularly happy. Globally, only a handful of SEZs, of the hundreds
that exist, have generated substantial exports, along with significant domestic
spin-offs in demand or technology upgradation. For each successful Shannon
(Ireland) or Shenzhen (China), there are 10 failures – in the Philippines,
Malaysia, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, why, even India. A
1998 report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on export processing
zones (EPZs) says: “Customs duty amounting to Rs. 7,500 crores was forgone for
achieving net foreign exchange earnings of Rs.4,700 crores.
The Reserve Bank of India says that large tax
incentives can be justified only if SEZ units establish strong “backward and
forward linkages with the domestic economy” which is a doubtful proposition.
Even the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) Chief Economist Raghuram Rajan has
warned: “Not only will [the SEZs] make the government forgo revenue it can ill
afford to lose, they also offer firms an incentive to shift existing production
to the new zones at substantial cost to society.”
As much as 75 per cent of the SEZ area can be
used for non-core activities, including development of residential or
commercial properties, shopping malls and hospitals. Developers will surely use
this to make money via the real estate route rather through export promotion.
This represents a potentially humongous urban property racket of incalculable
dimensions. India will see a multiplication of “Gurgaon-style” development,
under the aegis of big builders such as DLF, Marathon, Rahejas, Unitech, City
Parks and Dewan.
Conclusion: The SEZ’s could drastically improve the
economic activity in the country, make the country’s export competitive and
globally noticeable, be net foreign exchange earner and provide immense
employment opportunity. But this should not be done at the cost of bringing
down the agricultural activities, Land grabbing and real estate mafia should be
properly regulated so that the common man is not the net sufferer to get the
net foreign exchange earner up and running. As compared to china where majority
of the SEZ’s were setup by the government, similar should be adopted in India,
if not fully it should be a public-private partnership and regulatory bodies
should be properly managed to weed out fallacies. To be economically viable
SEZ’s should be approved over a particular land area (greater than 1000 acres)
for rapid economic growth in the area and for it to be profitable and self
sustainable. Relaxed Tax norms, Labor laws and DTA regulations will surely
attract foreign investment and major industries to setup industries in the
SEZ’s making it profitable and meeting its desired results!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)