ECONOMIC LAND REFORMS AGRICULTURE
·
INTRODUCTION :
When India became independent, Indian
agricultural sector was very backward. Changes of two types were necessary for agricultural
reconstruction namely mechanical changes and institutional changes. The former
were related to provision of modern agricultural inputs and latter were related
to the changes like provision of agricultural marketing facilities,
institutional credit and measures for changing the ownership structure of
agricultural lands. This third set of measures is known as Land Reforms.
·
DEFINITION :-
“Land
Reforms can be defined as the measures taken by the government to change the
distribution of land ownership and to make the agricultural land holdings
economically viable.”
·
OBJECTIVES OF LAND REFORMS :-
Broadly speaking the
objectives of land reforms can be described as economic efficiency and social
justice. Economic efficiency means to increase agricultural production and
social justice means to reduce economic inequalities. These are known
as TWIN OBJECTIVES because if the
land reforms are properly introduced then both the objectives would be
simultaneously achieved.
·
COMPONENTS & PROGRESS OF LAND
REFORMS :-
The various components of
Land Reforms are Zamindari abolition, Tenancy Reforms, Land ceiling, Land
consolidation and encouragement of Co-operative farming.
1)
ABOLITION OF INTERMEDIARIES :
Under the British rule, various systems of intermediaries Such as
Zamindari, Ryotwari and Mahalwari had developed. These Systems were a great
obstacle in the way of raising productivity in the agricultural sector. So the
most important component of the land reforms was abolition of the intermediaries.
Under this the waste lands and forest lands with the Zamindars have been taken
away by the state. In all 175 million acres of land were taken away and
distributed among landless workers. About 20 million farmers are brought into contact
of government.
2)
TENANCY REFORMS :
The tenancy reforms aimed at
improving the economic conditions of the tenant farmers who
used to cultivate the land belonging to the Zamindars by paying a rent. The
tenancy reforms had three components namely fixation of rent, security of tenancy rights and in certain cases ownership of the land for the tenants, various
states have passed legislations in this direction. The rents have been lowered
to 25% to 40% of the produce. Farmers are also given a security of their
rights.
3)
LAND CEILING :
The ceiling on land holdings has
been considered necessary in the light of severe land inequalities in the
distribution of land ownership. Accordingly the govt. has fixed a land ceiling
of 54 acres for non-irrigated lands, of 27 acres for partly irrigated land
where two crops are taken and of 18 acres for perennially irrigated lands for a
family of four i.e. Husband, wife and two minor children. Measures have been
taken for acquiring surplus lands from the Zamindars, and distributing those lands
among the landless laborers, advises, harijans, marginal farmers. About 21.15
million hectares of land has been thus distributed. This has benefitted 54.84
lakhs farmers.
4)
LAND CONSOLIDATION :-
Out
of the other two components of land reforms, one is consolidation of land
holdings which aimed at bringing together various pieces of lands to make them
economically viable. About 20 million Hectares have been consolidated so far.
5)
CO-OPERATIVE FARMING :
Here the govt.
wanted the farmers to organize farming on a co-operative basis. Practically no
progress has been achieved on this front as the farmers have not been able to
under.
EVALUATION OF LAND REFORMS:
As pointed out by the 4th
plan document, the program of redistributing the land ownership through land
reforms has resulted into a fiasco. A variety of factors have contributed to
the failure of land reforms. Thus land reforms have practically failed.
Factors Responsible For Poor Progress Of Land
Reforms:
1. There
is absence of up to date and reliable land records in the rural areas.
2.
Secondly the poor farmers are unaware of
their rights etc. and are unorganized.
3.
The administrative machinery in India
comes from the elite class and has no sympathy for the cause of the poor
farmers.
4.
There were many loopholes in the land
legislations, the benefit of which has been fully taken by the landlord class.
5.
Most of the state government does not
have enough political will to put the land reforms into action.
6.
The judicial system is costly and beyond
the reach of the farmers.
7.
There was a conspicuous absence of rural
leadership in the farming sector.
8.
There was a great delay in passing and
implementing the land legislations.
9.
The landlords are a very powerful class
both socially and economically which does not allow the govt. to push through
the land reforms.
10. The
land ceiling legislations have failed because in earlier years the ceilings
were not only very high but also many concessions were given for keeping extra
lands.
No comments:
Post a Comment